We are stooges being played for suckers. Disclosure will not come from Congress nor the White House. Only a patriot (whistleblower) with stage 4 cancer, no dependents, unimpeachable evidence and an "eat sh_t" attitude can move the ball now.
NSFW — Apologies in advance, but it increasingly seems like the best shot we’ve got at Disclosure is to let Diddy outta jail to co-host/headline a weekslong Washington freak off. Then Napalm us — and then come back in a few months and the Capital’s yours!*
*Again, apologies — this is how the press corps survives having sick fucks as our subjects
Man, I continue to be befuddled as to the level of interest in an assassination that took place over 60 years ago rather than something that would literally be world changing 🤦🏻♂️
I should tag you on X with this exchange I am having with someone on X with ARRO in his handle (which might not mean shit, of course) to see what you can find out. What he’s saying goes against everything I know, but that’s limited to California and I can only speculate how different it is in DC.
They may be right. And don’t get me wrong. The Kennedy stuff is fascinating and distressing to be sure. But it just seems to be a losing sight of the forest for the trees type of situation.
Yes, I remember that. I just find his statement here somewhat puzzling. Is he referring to Comer? Certainly Johnson was never really interested. Turner was dead set against it, but he’s gone.
from my perspective, Luna — whether subpoena-power-less or bypassing her senior Burchett and being anointed Chair — is leadership. Like, the whole spectrum — when she’s empowered and active, that’s a ‘gift’ from ‘GOP Leadership’ (by that I mean Speaker and Comer…and possibly 👋 Mike Turner, but as Burlison alluded to in last nights post, he’s pretty convinced the game changer for this years NDAA will be Turners absence; well powerlessness, really. Not as convinced as he is — but he’s in the mix and the ONLY positive difference from 118th to 119th Congress is Turner’s absence.
It’s tangible. Like, Himes did a 180 and actually admitted HPSCI does do UAPs. There are other examples, but it seriously feels lighter (which means they’re likely pumping noxious gas into our press
I’ve sensed that a bit - Grusch’s public hearing kicked off an insane interest. But we’ve lost some momentum. While I’m less skeptical of his claims these days, I think Jake Barber’s initial interview release was a huge blunder and hurt our own community’s support. NN botched the editing.
We need another bombshell to come out, and I’m not sure another whistleblower with claims but no evidence will cut it. Either, a fucking former defense secretary or president just needs to come out and say it, or they need to wheel out a craft.
With all this said, I can’t appreciate Rep Burlison enough for hiring Grusch and continuing to be focused on this subject and doing everything he can to move the narrative forward. Luna’s focus seems to be split with the other disclosure Taskforce narratives; I hope she pivots back to solely focusing on this topic because I think it’s far more important than the other ones. I hope Schumer and Rounds keep this topic in mind. It does feel like we’ve lost Gillibrand and Rubio, Rubio I think was far more likely to actually get shit done.
This shit is not easy, and we need to keep fighting. I can’t thank Professor Laslo enough for continuing this fight, even though he’s probably losing some money doing this. Matt, you are integral to all that has happened in the last two years regarding this subject. If I had the funds. I would hire you full time to bug the shit out of every politician on this subject. Please keep the fight going, because we literally can not do this without you.
If the UAP Disclosure Fund and their cohorts (Sheehan, Nolan, Coulthart, etc.) were serious about making a difference on the Hill they would organize a crowd fund for Ask_A_Pol.
We are stooges being played for suckers. Disclosure will not come from Congress nor the White House. Only a patriot (whistleblower) with stage 4 cancer, no dependents, unimpeachable evidence and an "eat sh_t" attitude can move the ball now.
NSFW — Apologies in advance, but it increasingly seems like the best shot we’ve got at Disclosure is to let Diddy outta jail to co-host/headline a weekslong Washington freak off. Then Napalm us — and then come back in a few months and the Capital’s yours!*
*Again, apologies — this is how the press corps survives having sick fucks as our subjects
Man, I continue to be befuddled as to the level of interest in an assassination that took place over 60 years ago rather than something that would literally be world changing 🤦🏻♂️
Why do you hate America!? 🇺🇸 *
*we’re both gonna get fuckin shot now…
😂
Well shit. I’m already out here urging Tim Phillips to lawyer up and sue for wrongful termination so….😂😂
That one caught my fucking eye. Tulsi?*
*remind me to put in an interview request for Luna 🎙️ and Tulsi 🎙️ session… 🧐
I should tag you on X with this exchange I am having with someone on X with ARRO in his handle (which might not mean shit, of course) to see what you can find out. What he’s saying goes against everything I know, but that’s limited to California and I can only speculate how different it is in DC.
Many believe it is the same ball of yarn.
Congress should consider getting a cat.. 🐈
They may be right. And don’t get me wrong. The Kennedy stuff is fascinating and distressing to be sure. But it just seems to be a losing sight of the forest for the trees type of situation.
Who did Garcia mean? Which GOP leaders are less interested? Or was that just a total dodge?
Garcia is one of the few Dems on the UAP Caucus; he asked some very important questions at Grusch’s HoC hearing https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SNgoul4vyDM&t=2635s&pp=2AHjDJACAQ%3D%3D
Yes, I remember that. I just find his statement here somewhat puzzling. Is he referring to Comer? Certainly Johnson was never really interested. Turner was dead set against it, but he’s gone.
Right? Planing to follow up on that.
from my perspective, Luna — whether subpoena-power-less or bypassing her senior Burchett and being anointed Chair — is leadership. Like, the whole spectrum — when she’s empowered and active, that’s a ‘gift’ from ‘GOP Leadership’ (by that I mean Speaker and Comer…and possibly 👋 Mike Turner, but as Burlison alluded to in last nights post, he’s pretty convinced the game changer for this years NDAA will be Turners absence; well powerlessness, really. Not as convinced as he is — but he’s in the mix and the ONLY positive difference from 118th to 119th Congress is Turner’s absence.
It’s tangible. Like, Himes did a 180 and actually admitted HPSCI does do UAPs. There are other examples, but it seriously feels lighter (which means they’re likely pumping noxious gas into our press
Galleries again… 😉)
All the noxious gaslighting from Wright-Pat? 🤣🛸 Good to have you on the case, Professor! Watch out for those low-flying Tic-Tacs…
I’ve sensed that a bit - Grusch’s public hearing kicked off an insane interest. But we’ve lost some momentum. While I’m less skeptical of his claims these days, I think Jake Barber’s initial interview release was a huge blunder and hurt our own community’s support. NN botched the editing.
We need another bombshell to come out, and I’m not sure another whistleblower with claims but no evidence will cut it. Either, a fucking former defense secretary or president just needs to come out and say it, or they need to wheel out a craft.
With all this said, I can’t appreciate Rep Burlison enough for hiring Grusch and continuing to be focused on this subject and doing everything he can to move the narrative forward. Luna’s focus seems to be split with the other disclosure Taskforce narratives; I hope she pivots back to solely focusing on this topic because I think it’s far more important than the other ones. I hope Schumer and Rounds keep this topic in mind. It does feel like we’ve lost Gillibrand and Rubio, Rubio I think was far more likely to actually get shit done.
This shit is not easy, and we need to keep fighting. I can’t thank Professor Laslo enough for continuing this fight, even though he’s probably losing some money doing this. Matt, you are integral to all that has happened in the last two years regarding this subject. If I had the funds. I would hire you full time to bug the shit out of every politician on this subject. Please keep the fight going, because we literally can not do this without you.
If the UAP Disclosure Fund and their cohorts (Sheehan, Nolan, Coulthart, etc.) were serious about making a difference on the Hill they would organize a crowd fund for Ask_A_Pol.