Yes, it could. I don’t know why I interpreted it to mean inside Congress, and I might be wrong. Matt was there and asking the question. He doubtless has a better sense of what was meant.
Yes, it could. I don’t know why I interpreted it to mean inside Congress, and I might be wrong. Matt was there and asking the question. He doubtless has a better sense of what was meant.
I agree with Matt here, they need not be mutually exclusive. If we’ve learned anything about the Control Group, it’s that they try to never do the dirty work themselves so as to maintain plausible deniability. “They” exert pressure on Comer or whoever, and he then pressures the UAP caucus to cancel the hearing, or uninvite the 1st hand whistleblowers.
Yes, it could. I don’t know why I interpreted it to mean inside Congress, and I might be wrong. Matt was there and asking the question. He doubtless has a better sense of what was meant.
No doubt. Care to weigh in, Professor?
*can we tag each other here? Cause if not that’s a f’n flaw!
I'd say not
@matt Laslo
I agree with Matt here, they need not be mutually exclusive. If we’ve learned anything about the Control Group, it’s that they try to never do the dirty work themselves so as to maintain plausible deniability. “They” exert pressure on Comer or whoever, and he then pressures the UAP caucus to cancel the hearing, or uninvite the 1st hand whistleblowers.