Ask a Pol uaps
Ask a Pol uaps
Secrets Task Force wants David Grusch, Lue Elizondo & AARO in SCIF at same time
11
0:00
-1:42

Secrets Task Force wants David Grusch, Lue Elizondo & AARO in SCIF at same time

Ep. 333 — Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (2-26-2025)
11
UAP Caucus Co-chairs Reps. Anna Paulina Luna and Tim Burchett prepare to question whistleblower David Grusch in 2023. Photo: Matt Laslo

Who?

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) — Chair, Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets

LISTEN: Laslo & Luna

0:00
-1:42

Ask a Pol asks:

Any UAP update?

Key Luna:

“[Rep.] Eric Burlison had a really good idea to get [UFO whistleblower David] Grusch into the SCIF [sensitive compartmented information facility], doing a read in for his security clearance,” Rep. Anna Paulina Luna exclusively tells Ask a Pol. “And then having him, Lue Elizondo and AARO [the Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office] there to flush out some stuff.”

Ask a Pol’s FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! Get our latest news first.

Caught our ear:

“So we're gonna try to do a temporary read in,” Luna tells us. “There's certain things that you can share in a SCIF with a temporary read in.”

Leave a comment

Below find a rough transcript of Ask a Pol’s exclusive interview with Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), slightly edited for clarity.

TRANSCRIPT: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna

SCENE: On this sunny, 60 degree day in the nation’s Capitol, Rep. Anna Paulina and an aide are walking up to the US Capitol during the only vote series in the US House of Representatives Wednesday when Ask a Pol’s Matt Laslo approaches.

Matt Laslo: “Madam Chair.”

Anna Paulina Luna: “Hey, what’s going on?”

ML: “How are you?”

UFO whistleblower David Grusch testifies before House Oversight Committee. Photo: Matt Laslo

APL: “Good. How are you?”

ML: “Livin the dream.”

APL: “UAP update?”

ML: “Yeah.”

APL: “Yeah. Eric Burlison had a really good idea to get Grusch into the SCIF, doing a read in for his security clearance, and then having him, Lue Elizondo and AARO there to flush out some stuff.”

ICYMI — Elizondo testified before Congress in November

ML: “Oh interesting.”

APL: “So we're looking at coordinating that. And I know, although I'm Chair, I'm taking all the advice from [UAP Caucus Co-chair Tim] Burchett — because you know, he's been lead point on this for years — and then also Eric Burlison’s very active as well. And so we're working as a team. This is not just my fight. This is everyone.”

ML: “Interesting. So does he have to get his clearance?”

APL: “We're gonna.”

ML: “Like, is that taken care of or…?”

APL: “So we're gonna try to do a temporary read in.”

Share

ML: “Interesting.”

APL: “There's certain things that you can share in a SCIF with a temporary read in.”

ML: “Yeah? Oh cool.”

APL: “Thank you.”

Luna starts walking past the security checkpoint.

ML: “Preciate ya.”

Share Ask a Pol UAPs

Content posted at AskaPol.com is copyrighted. Use our original content to move the story forward. And, please, link to us.

Need a FREE VIP subscription?

Student? Lost your gig? Hard times? Been there. Got you. No questions asked.

Just ping us.

Discussion about this episode

User's avatar
boy march's avatar

let's hope she follows through

Expand full comment
Matt Laslo's avatar

That is another conversation altogether. JFK first!

Expand full comment
MikeD's avatar

She’s only taken on every government conspiracy and coverup. Even one would be a lot in such a short time frame. Hence why I question the legitimacy of what’s going on here.

Expand full comment
Les Ferguson, Jr.'s avatar

Good job, friend!

Expand full comment
Valters Lauzums's avatar

This is great news! Thank you for the updates.

Expand full comment
Michael's avatar

Great update, thanks Matt!

Expand full comment
Joshua Bertrand (korea_ufo)'s avatar

Scooooops, Las. Props. *claps*

Expand full comment
Rex Tinch's avatar

A temporary "read-in" clearance in a SCIF grants very limited and controlled access to specific information. Even if it is granted it will not mean much. More smoke and no fire.

Expand full comment
Matt Laslo's avatar

It’s so curious. Abnormal for sure. But would be a 💪— and bet it’d depend on Hegseth, honestly…

Expand full comment
Wan's avatar

Great scoops thanks matt!

What is the best case scenario out of a meeting like this?

Expand full comment
Valters Lauzums's avatar

It's anyone's best guess. We're on an unpaved road.

Expand full comment