Any chance it’s held at Skinwalker Ranch? Known site of government research program. The findings point to intradimensional evidence. Many scientists who’ve worked there are public. It’s tied to Corbel and Knap. I’m sure Brandon Fugal would love to host
That sounds like political theater. Other than give politicians some press I’m not sure what that would accomplish unless it’s getting some great witnesses under oath.
I thought the point of hearings was to some degree political theater to apply pressure and influence public sentiment/interest? Otherwise, why not just hold them all in SCIFs where witnesses can answer everything?
Not sure why they would break away from putting witnesses under oath like the last hearing. Their problem may be, since they want to focus on government officials and contractors they’ve mentioned, whether or not they participate sans subpoena. Oversight can subpoena even without a select committee so this will be interesting.
I’m gonna guess somewhere in Florida. It’s home for both Luna and Moskowitz and definitely has some interesting places to go poking around in (Eglin, MacDill, Patrick, etc...)
Awesome work. Glad to be subscribed.
Preciate ya!
Let’s go visit Mike Turner’s constitute Lockheed 😈
Game on!
Any chance it’s held at Skinwalker Ranch? Known site of government research program. The findings point to intradimensional evidence. Many scientists who’ve worked there are public. It’s tied to Corbel and Knap. I’m sure Brandon Fugal would love to host
Could be. They're all mum now.
But remember we do have a fan of Skinwalker Ranch in the Senate https://www.askapol.com/p/exclusive-sen-mike-lee-im-on-an-episode?lli=1&utm_source=%2Fsearch%2Fskin%2520walker%2520ranch&utm_medium=reader2
How would a field hearing even work. I can’t say that I can recall a recent example
They're just hearings held on location, ie outside of the Capitol / Washington. Though we have no idea what they're thinking... https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RS20928.html
That’s helpful. The venue would have to consent to allow the hearing correct?
I presume. But I’m curious if they don’t try to hold it in front of the gates of a classified facility or base, ya know?
That could be amazing or a total disaster. 🤔
They’ve said before if they’re denied access they may just set up in front of the gate or nearby haha.
That sounds like political theater. Other than give politicians some press I’m not sure what that would accomplish unless it’s getting some great witnesses under oath.
I thought the point of hearings was to some degree political theater to apply pressure and influence public sentiment/interest? Otherwise, why not just hold them all in SCIFs where witnesses can answer everything?
If they are putting witnesses under oath yes. If not it’s just more political noise and the general media and public will continue to ignore it.
Not sure why they would break away from putting witnesses under oath like the last hearing. Their problem may be, since they want to focus on government officials and contractors they’ve mentioned, whether or not they participate sans subpoena. Oversight can subpoena even without a select committee so this will be interesting.
The witnesses should be under oath, even if on the road.
I’m gonna guess somewhere in Florida. It’s home for both Luna and Moskowitz and definitely has some interesting places to go poking around in (Eglin, MacDill, Patrick, etc...)
no idea!
Story of my life!