9 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Curious Explorer's avatar

This directly contradicts other sources, including Grusch himself, and Nancy Mace, who you reported said: "So to get waivers for any witnesses that want to get into a SCIF [Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility], would need a waiver on TS/SCI [top secret or sensitive compartmented information] clearance or to be able to do that. Even though they have their clearances, they would need a waiver from the Pentagon to get into a SCIF, so I put a request in for that."

Reading between the lines, it seems that the Pentagon is taking the position that it won't clear Grusch to testify because he doesn't have an active clearance (essentially, he's not cleared to hear himself speak).

Also, this sounds ridiculous on its face. 1. Between the Senate and the SOL Foundation, the idea that the resources don't exist to provide travel is not believable. 2. You mean to tell me that the US government hasn't perfected secure communications systems to transmit classified info?

Is she lying to you?

Expand full comment
Matt Laslo's avatar

All politicians lie. I let em then trap em when time is right....

Expand full comment
ErrorError