Thanks, Matt. You’ve cultivated a nice rapport with Burlison, Burchett, and Luna. I know that’s not easy. We appreciate it.
I thought they did a great job with the last hearing. I realize the people they want to speak with are from military or defense companies, but what’s the point of interrogatories, or especially subpoenas (which is the stronger choice), for the
Some anonymous staffer on the Oversight committee (at the behest of Comer) will deep-six this someway somehow in the spirit of Sen Roger Wicker. Time for catastrophic disclosure or game over.
Thanks, Matt. You’ve cultivated a nice rapport with Burlison, Burchett, and Luna. I know that’s not easy. We appreciate it.
I thought they did a great job with the last hearing. I realize the people they want to speak with are from military or defense companies, but what’s the point of interrogatories, or especially subpoenas (which is the stronger choice), for the
SCIF when they're spending taxpayer dollars?
Some anonymous staffer on the Oversight committee (at the behest of Comer) will deep-six this someway somehow in the spirit of Sen Roger Wicker. Time for catastrophic disclosure or game over.
Which agencies? Which companies? That answer cannot be classified. The questions perhaps, but not which agencies & companies.
Interrogatories. I'd love to have the chance to read those. Even more so the answers but I'm betting they get nothing from it.