Who?
Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD) — Senate Armed Services & Intelligence Committees*
*Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s lead Republican co-author of the UAPDA
ICYMI — Rounds & Schumer’s 2023 UAP colloquy
LISTEN: Laslo & Rounds
Ask a Pol asks:
Are we gonna see the UAPDA in this year’s NDAA [National Defense Authorization Act]?
Key Rounds:
“I think it might be in there,” Sen. Mike Rounds exclusively tells Ask a Pol. “At least I think we’ve got a shot at it, because I think anything that comes over would be with a manager’s package that we’re putting together now.”*
*‘managers’ is another name for conferees, so this is, basically, Washington-speak for ‘conference report’
With this year’s NDAA, you’re kinda predicting the same as last year — no real conference committee?
“The best hope we’ve got is pre-conference with the House and then have the House send us a message that basically, you know, is privileged so it can come in and then it becomes an up or down vote. I think that’s gonna be the only way this is gonna happen in the near term,” Rounds says. “And I’m just being practical.”*
*Both the House and Senate are now on summer vacation, we mean, recess. They’re not slated to return to Washington until the week of September 9th. It’s an election year, and the two divided chambers still have to work out a deal to fund the government. The NDAA is an annual, must-pass measure, because it authorizes the military.
The fear amongst the Congressional UAP Caucus now is that without a formal conference committee — where rank-and-file senators and representatives alike sit down and negotiate through the differences between their two chambers’ respective bills — like last year, House and Senate leaders will be empowered to negotiate the NDAA in secret.
Stay tuned…
Who gutted Schumer’s UAPDA last year?
Who in the House are you negotiating with on the new UAPDA, Intel or Armed Services?
“Well, both,” Rounds says, “But Intel’s got a big part of it.”
Of the UAPDA?
“They did last year,” Rounds (finally!!!!!) admits to Ask a Pol.*
*Ask a Pol’s takeaway:
The Top Democrat on HPSCI, Rep. Jim Himes, is either so indifferent to all things UAPs that he’s cut out of the conversations, which would mean House Intel Chair Mike Turner is in the driver’s seat.
Or Himes repeatedly lied to our — and thus your! — face…
Send us your thoughts! After a year, we’re still on it…
ICYMI — Himes told us UAPs never came up last year
Below find a rough transcript of Ask a Pol’s exclusive interview with Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD), slightly edited for clarity.
SUBSCRIBER-ONLY CONTENT*
*Student? Lost your gig? Hard times? Been there. Got you. No questions asked. Just ping us.
TRANSCRIPT: Sen. Mike Rounds
SCENE: Sen. Rounds and two of his aides are walking through the basement of the Capitol before hopping an elevator to the Senate floor so he can vote.
Matt Laslo: “Hey, how are you doing, senator?”
Mike Rounds: “Good, how are you doing?”
ML: “Livin the dream.”
MR: “Two days! Hey, you finally caught me.”
Ahead of the Senate starting its monthlong August recess, congressional beat reporters hogged Rounds’ time. After patiently waiting in the wings Monday and Tuesday, Laslo had to give up both days (as he, basically, interviewed 1/3rd of the Senate each day this week), which Rounds’ aides seem to have mentioned to him.
We work hard for…what money? Que sera sera
Consider chipping in to support our independent journalism — Venmo, PayPal, Cash App — or just buy us a beer!
ML: “Patience. Patience.”
Sen. Rounds laughs.
ML: “I was curious, I heard you yesterday on the NDAA, you were kinda predicting the same as last year with no real conference committee?”
Listen to this episode with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Ask a Pol uaps to listen to this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.
