I’m confused. Why not go straight to the subpoena? An interrogatory is just a written request for information that can be delayed, dodged due to “classification,” or even met with more half-truths. A subpoena is more binding. Since Congress controls budgets, how can millions of taxpayer dollars continue to be spent without explanation? Isn’t this merely more stalling?
I like the sound of this, answer untruthfully and they could be hoisted on their own petard, ignore the letter they may find a subpoena on the way.
This is exciting!
🤞
I’m confused. Why not go straight to the subpoena? An interrogatory is just a written request for information that can be delayed, dodged due to “classification,” or even met with more half-truths. A subpoena is more binding. Since Congress controls budgets, how can millions of taxpayer dollars continue to be spent without explanation? Isn’t this merely more stalling?
Right? Perplexed myself.
Nice work, as always, Matt!
The noose tightens.
Roggs (interrogatories) are an option in the discovery portion of litigation. Did Congress sue the DOD...?