The mistake, and perhaps the likely desire of the WSJ article, is to get people to assume this explains all UFOs. Conceptually, there is nothing new in the article.
💯— possibly ‘greatest’ thing Kirkpatrick did is plant, entice and spin that WSJ piece…
The mistake, and perhaps the likely desire of the WSJ article, is to get people to assume this explains all UFOs. Conceptually, there is nothing new in the article.
💯— possibly ‘greatest’ thing Kirkpatrick did is plant, entice and spin that WSJ piece…