I can’t imagine (if the UAPDA were to pass as is and be signed into law) who Trump would appoint to the panel that would be genuinely friendly to Disclosure. We have the evidence now of the drone fandango dance and the Epstein files three-card monte. I would love to know what Rounds and Burlison are really thinking as they push this forward. I can’t believe that it would be permitted to go through as is. And if not, what’s the point?
I can’t imagine (if the UAPDA were to pass as is and be signed into law) who Trump would appoint to the panel that would be genuinely friendly to Disclosure. We have the evidence now of the drone fandango dance and the Epstein files three-card monte. I would love to know what Rounds and Burlison are really thinking as they push this forward. I can’t believe that it would be permitted to go through as is. And if not, what’s the point?
very illuminating!.. Thanks Matt!
So theoretically speaking:
Ranking Members: JIM HIMES (D) and ADAM SMITH (D) could in fact have prevented their full clearance acess or having subpoena-power, then?
Wow!
Great work, Matt. Using Greenewald as a source (and vice versa) is a smart step. That guy is a bulldog as well. Keep at their heels.