I guess here's a question for Matt that shouldn't reveal anything off-the-record. In your opinion, do you think we are witnessing an earnest effort to get to the truth on this subject during these hearings?
See the note in the transcript? We went off the record, and for transparency sake I always silence how ever long we go off the record. And we never went back on.
But hey look!! A cute dog!! Worst attempt at a distraction. It’s so obvious. Completely agree Joseph. It’s a deflection, she was made to feel uncomfortable and reacted.
I can appreciate Laslo not getting too aggressive, you can’t get people to talk if they don’t want to talk to you….
But everyone shrugged off that Shellenberger/Corbell Hearing drama as Corbell just wanting attention.
Their latest Weaponized pod with Matt Brown makes it crystal clear, for some reason, they (Mace/Shellenberger) wanted the “big story” but didn’t want ALL the details the key witness would have had to share along with it. It’s clear they both knew this individual and his intentions, and yet, they’ve played dumb this whole time. And part 3 of that interview hasn’t even been dropped yet.
Best to get her on the record as much as possible on this issue before that releases. Part 2 was left on a Shellenberger cliff hanger and I’m just gonna assume it’s not positive news. Curious what Nancy has to say about all this other than pretending she has no idea what anyone is talking about. If we’re looking to keep everyone truthful, now would be the time to press this and not let go.
The way she carries herself (in all respects) is to create a show. Grab headlines. I don’t get the impression she cares about this issue beyond what it may do for her political career. That’s just my opinion.
I agree completely. People who have an irrational animus towards Jeremy (or are motivated by more sinister aims) wanted to make it seem like he was just a prima donna throwing a snit. But he was being played, and he was angry, and I don’t blame him. And I don’t blame Professor Laslo for not wanting to push her further. The truth is coming out. Harald Malmgren’s interview, Puthoff and Davis getting out there in ways they never have, Grusch on staff—it all says to me that some kind of genuine disclosure is not far off.
I guess here's a question for Matt that shouldn't reveal anything off-the-record. In your opinion, do you think we are witnessing an earnest effort to get to the truth on this subject during these hearings?
The recording stopped abruptly about halfway through.
Mace says she hasn’t seen the video clip yet. But I thought Corbell said that he brought Brown before the committee for an interview. So…
See the note in the transcript? We went off the record, and for transparency sake I always silence how ever long we go off the record. And we never went back on.
Got it!🙏👍
But hey look!! A cute dog!! Worst attempt at a distraction. It’s so obvious. Completely agree Joseph. It’s a deflection, she was made to feel uncomfortable and reacted.
I can appreciate Laslo not getting too aggressive, you can’t get people to talk if they don’t want to talk to you….
But everyone shrugged off that Shellenberger/Corbell Hearing drama as Corbell just wanting attention.
Their latest Weaponized pod with Matt Brown makes it crystal clear, for some reason, they (Mace/Shellenberger) wanted the “big story” but didn’t want ALL the details the key witness would have had to share along with it. It’s clear they both knew this individual and his intentions, and yet, they’ve played dumb this whole time. And part 3 of that interview hasn’t even been dropped yet.
Best to get her on the record as much as possible on this issue before that releases. Part 2 was left on a Shellenberger cliff hanger and I’m just gonna assume it’s not positive news. Curious what Nancy has to say about all this other than pretending she has no idea what anyone is talking about. If we’re looking to keep everyone truthful, now would be the time to press this and not let go.
The way she carries herself (in all respects) is to create a show. Grab headlines. I don’t get the impression she cares about this issue beyond what it may do for her political career. That’s just my opinion.
I agree completely. People who have an irrational animus towards Jeremy (or are motivated by more sinister aims) wanted to make it seem like he was just a prima donna throwing a snit. But he was being played, and he was angry, and I don’t blame him. And I don’t blame Professor Laslo for not wanting to push her further. The truth is coming out. Harald Malmgren’s interview, Puthoff and Davis getting out there in ways they never have, Grusch on staff—it all says to me that some kind of genuine disclosure is not far off.
💯%
Mace is a puppet of the MIC. There will be no disclosure through her nor though the executive branch.