Can anyone explain the importance of Grusch’s restored security clearance? A clearance typically provides access to information to an individual so they can do a job, not so they can discuss that information with others. Maybe it’s needed simply to enter a SCIF? But why then all the effort to get Grusch into a SCIF last year during his testimony if he didn’t have a clearance? Also, Title 10 and Title 50 have explicit laws regarding how sensitive/secret intelligence and defense information gets shared with Congress and with whom specifically. How does a security clearance change an individual’s ability to comply with those laws.
Hey Matt, how can I buy you a beer?
Yessir! buymeacoffee.com/AskaPol
No SCI for Grusch no SCIF for Grusch no disclosure from Oversight clown car. (But good work, Matt. Keep bugging them.)
Can anyone explain the importance of Grusch’s restored security clearance? A clearance typically provides access to information to an individual so they can do a job, not so they can discuss that information with others. Maybe it’s needed simply to enter a SCIF? But why then all the effort to get Grusch into a SCIF last year during his testimony if he didn’t have a clearance? Also, Title 10 and Title 50 have explicit laws regarding how sensitive/secret intelligence and defense information gets shared with Congress and with whom specifically. How does a security clearance change an individual’s ability to comply with those laws.