One thing’s clear after Friday’s classified UFO briefing in one of the US Capitol’s SCIFs: Lawmakers in both parties — who are increasingly frustrated with stonewalling — are united in demanding more answers in both classified briefings and public hearings.
“We didn’t see anything definitive on the existence of extraterrestrials, but definitely some concerns on whether things are being shared across the inter-agencies that should be,” Rep. Mike Waltz (R-FL) exclusively told Ask a Pol after leaving the SCIF briefing.
Waltz sits on both the Intelligence and Armed Services Committees, which have oversight over the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office — or AARO — Congress set up to track UAPs (or UFOs).
UFO whistleblower David Grusch warned the Inspector General and members of Congress that there are Special Access Programs — or SAPs — hidden from Congress. Waltz fears those programs may also be hidden from AARO officials.
“Well, I want to understand if the taskforce that Congress has mandated truly has access. I mean that’s what I think from the process standpoint, we need to verify,” Waltz said. “I mean, that was one of the key aspects of his complaint, right? Was that there were compartments that exist.”
Members of both parties left Friday’s SCIF briefing demanding more answers — both publicly and in classified settings.
“I think there's additional hearings that should be had in public. I think there's additional classified briefings that we should have,” Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) exclusively told Ask a Pol while heading to vote on the US House floor Friday. “But I think the most important thing is to take this seriously, and to not turn it into a joke and to not dismiss it as fringe.”
While some powerful leaders on Capitol Hill laugh off the ongoing UAP investigation, rank-and-file lawmakers have taken the lead.
“The truth is, we don't know what UAPs are. It is a national security concern, and we should address it as such,” Garcia added.
While many lawmakers reported progress in Friday’s Inspector General briefing in the SCIF, attendees say they still have unanswered questions and they’re vowing not to let up anytime soon.
“Moderately interesting,” Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) told Ask a Pol after the classified briefing. “Like every good meeting, I'm left with even more questions than before.”
Those sentiments are being echoed by members of the Congressional UAP Caucus, especially it’s leaders, like co-chair Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, who are frustrated by the foot dragging but who report trusting Grusch more and more after each classified briefing.
“We are going to continue to move forward, track down and do what we need to do,” Luna (R-FL) told Ask a Pol last week. “But if I'm at the point where I know that our witness is good, I'm going to then work with him directly, because I feel like that's the best way, not only to get information out to the American people but also to to ensure that we're not chasing ghosts.”
MARK YOUR CALENDAR: THURSDAY (18th) UAP LAWMAKER LIVE SESSION w/ Laslo
As a THANK YOU! to subscribers*, Matt Laslo’s moderating a live Q and A this Thursday evening (NEW: 6pm EST) with a member of the Congressional UAP Caucus.
Stay tuned for more details…
*Student? Lost your gig? Hard times? Been there. Got you. No questions asked. Just ping us.
LISTEN: Laslo & Waltz
LISTEN: Laslo & Garcia
LISTEN: Laslo & Biggs
Matt Laslo’s a veteran congressional correspondent, new media prof. & founder of Ask a Pol — a new, people-powered press corps.
Ask a Pol — asking your lawmakers your questions at your US Capitol. Follow us: @Ask_a_Pol (or @askpols on Insta).
SUBSCRIBER-ONLY CONTENT *
* Student? Lost your gig? Hard times? Been there. Got you. No questions asked. Just ping us.
Below find rough transcripts of Ask a Pol’s exclusive interview with Reps. Mike Waltz (R-FL), Robert Garcia (D-CA) and Andy Biggs (R-AZ), slightly edited for clarity.
I. TRANSCRIPT: Rep. Mike Waltz
Matt Laslo: “How you doing? How’d it go in there?”
Mike Waltz: “What’s that?”
ML: “How’d it go in there — in the SCIF?”
MW: “Ahh, it was interesting.”
ML: “Was it — like Moskowitz told us it was illuminating.”
MW: “What’s that?”
ML: “Moskowitz told us it was illuminating — that some questions were finally answered?”
MW: “Ehh— it was very process oriented. There wasn’t, you know…”
Listen to this episode with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Ask a Pol uaps to listen to this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.
