Exactly Laslo!!! Great job!! Today was therr chance to make the case "My vote for you ask speaker in exchange for a UAP Select Committee." They must not want it that bad.
Getting Dave Grusch on the case would be such a great development for 2025. I do wonder what has happened to his 11 hours of testimony. Thanks for all you do Matt! This gives me hope. I Would love to hear fewer "dadgum it" or "dag nabbits" from the UAP representatives of the Southern Midwest and more "hot dang" or similar!
Can Grusch get his clearances back? I thought that was in the works at some point. Would the members of such a select committee themselves have the clearances to hear certain testimony even in executive session or SCIF? A well-prepared, week-long televised hearing of the caliber of the Watergate Committee hearings could prove to be a singular event. Depending on what parameters would constrain them and witness testimony. Firsthand witnesses would need real protection.
Many thanks for sharing your knowledge on this, which far surpasses mine. I can’t remember where I heard or read this, or if I’m remembering correctly, but I thought that Grusch couldn’t even get into a SCIF with cleared members of Congress without having his own clearances restored. Lue has his clearances as he is still working on contract with DoD. Ideally, I would think, a Select Committee would come out of the Senate, with members drawn from Intel and Armed Services. But Rounds, who I would expect to lead such a charge, has not indicated any interest in pursuing this.
Exactly Laslo!!! Great job!! Today was therr chance to make the case "My vote for you ask speaker in exchange for a UAP Select Committee." They must not want it that bad.
Getting Dave Grusch on the case would be such a great development for 2025. I do wonder what has happened to his 11 hours of testimony. Thanks for all you do Matt! This gives me hope. I Would love to hear fewer "dadgum it" or "dag nabbits" from the UAP representatives of the Southern Midwest and more "hot dang" or similar!
Haha 🤣 — I live your last sentence!!!!!
Great idea. Give them hazard pay and all the "tickets" they require.
Can Grusch get his clearances back? I thought that was in the works at some point. Would the members of such a select committee themselves have the clearances to hear certain testimony even in executive session or SCIF? A well-prepared, week-long televised hearing of the caliber of the Watergate Committee hearings could prove to be a singular event. Depending on what parameters would constrain them and witness testimony. Firsthand witnesses would need real protection.
All great questions. And I don’t think anyone has answers…yet…on it!
I’m good on questions. It’s answers that prove more challenging.
Many thanks for sharing your knowledge on this, which far surpasses mine. I can’t remember where I heard or read this, or if I’m remembering correctly, but I thought that Grusch couldn’t even get into a SCIF with cleared members of Congress without having his own clearances restored. Lue has his clearances as he is still working on contract with DoD. Ideally, I would think, a Select Committee would come out of the Senate, with members drawn from Intel and Armed Services. But Rounds, who I would expect to lead such a charge, has not indicated any interest in pursuing this.
HELL YEAH’