Awesome scoop Matt. Seriously appreciate you staying on them about Dave. Massive distractions abound between JFK, Epstein, drone activity, etc. As far as we all know, Dave has the keys to the kingdom and congressional investigation into his claims will yield the most fruit with the fewest efforts. I sincerely hope there is more effort on congress's part (and questioning from diligent journalists) directed this way.
Do all the reps on the Oversight committee have ts/sci and any other tickets they need to hear Dave Grusch's classified testimony in private? Does hiring Dave Grusch on staff provide him with ironclad protection from DOD/MIC reprisal? Will the reps actually sit in and hear his testimony or will they delegate this to their staff and so continue the political rope a dope?
Members of congress aren't technically required to carry security clearances by virtue of being elected by the people. But there are laws regarding what info is shared between the DOD/Executive Branch and Congress, who it is shared with and requirements for its protection against unauthorized disclosure after it's shared. Not requiring a clearance for congressional members doesn't mean they are entitled to any restricted/sensitive information.
If Grusch hasn't been able to tell Congress about what he knows due to his required ongoing, post-military confidentiality, I don't see how having him on congressional staff would change that.
Awesome scoop Matt. Seriously appreciate you staying on them about Dave. Massive distractions abound between JFK, Epstein, drone activity, etc. As far as we all know, Dave has the keys to the kingdom and congressional investigation into his claims will yield the most fruit with the fewest efforts. I sincerely hope there is more effort on congress's part (and questioning from diligent journalists) directed this way.
THIS IS WHY I SUB
… and because I FUCKING LOVE YOU MATT!
Please confront Rep Luna on the issues raised by Lester Nare regarding her failure to secure Dave Grusch's classified testimony. Thanks.
Holy crap
Everyone should blow up Comer's office and insist he hires Grusch onto Oversight committee.
Do all the reps on the Oversight committee have ts/sci and any other tickets they need to hear Dave Grusch's classified testimony in private? Does hiring Dave Grusch on staff provide him with ironclad protection from DOD/MIC reprisal? Will the reps actually sit in and hear his testimony or will they delegate this to their staff and so continue the political rope a dope?
Members of congress aren't technically required to carry security clearances by virtue of being elected by the people. But there are laws regarding what info is shared between the DOD/Executive Branch and Congress, who it is shared with and requirements for its protection against unauthorized disclosure after it's shared. Not requiring a clearance for congressional members doesn't mean they are entitled to any restricted/sensitive information.
If Grusch hasn't been able to tell Congress about what he knows due to his required ongoing, post-military confidentiality, I don't see how having him on congressional staff would change that.
Thank you Matt, I do fear the stalling is a deliberate tactic (as opposed to tictac) to run the clock down. Truly hoping I'm wrong.
Sigh.
I worry about this, as it has been intentionally obscured that David Grusch is COO of Sol Foundation.
That incentive is to continue the "coverups" to continue selling $25k "Sol Foundation Memberships".
A literal disincentive toward transparency.
https://docs.house.gov/meetings/GO/GO06/20230726/116282/HHRG-118-GO06-Bio-GruschD-20230726.pdf
..Team GRUSCH. here!! 🤞🏻👀👍🏻